Research Article Appraisal

Paper details Instruction for Research Article Appraisal The criteria for the paper are drawn from the guidelines for identification of the steps of the quantitative research process and for determining study strengths and weaknesses as outlined in Chapter 18 of Gray, Grove, and Sutherland (2017). Use full sentences to answer the questions within the criteria, and provide rationales for your decisions (citing sources). Introduction (no heading). Give the reader a sense of what to expect in this paper (identify the article being appraised [cited appropriately] and state what parts of the appraisal will be included in this paper). Discuss author(s) qualifications to conduct the study (did educational preparation and clinical experience of author[s] support qualification to conduct study?). Discuss the clarity of the article title (were type of study, variables, and population identified?). Discuss the quality of the abstract (were purpose, design, sample, intervention, and key results presented?). Literature Review (ROL).

Briefly describe the clinical problem that prompted the study. Discuss the evidence provided for the significance (magnitude and impact) of the clinical problem (were magnitude and impact supported?). Discuss significance of the clinical problem to nursing? Identify the major topics discussed in the background in the ROL. Briefly explain whether the ROL section included sources current at the time of the study. Discuss whether the ROL included primary or secondary sources. Discuss whether the studies in the ROL were described, critically appraised, and synthesized to provide a clear summary of the current knowledge about the problem of interest. Explain how the ROL provided support for the current research study (were gaps in research knowledge discussed?). Research Problem, Purpose, Research Questions/Hypotheses. Identify the research problem of the study. Identify the study purpose. Does the purpose clearly address a gap in nursing knowledge (research problem) identified in and supported by the ROL? If there are research questions and/or hypotheses, identify them and discuss whether they follow from the research problem and purpose? State whether each of these were implied or explicitly stated. Theoretical Framework. Identify the theory/framework that supported the study. Was the framework explicitly identified by the researcher(s) or was it implied? Discuss the clarity of the presentation of the framework. List the important concepts of the theory/framework. Was there a model (diagram) of the theory/framework presented?

Discuss whether the study variables were linked to the theory/framework concepts. Were relationships among concepts explained and linked to the study purpose /hypothesis? Was a theoretical proposition (relational statement) stated and linked to the study purpose/hypothesis? Variables. List the major study variables and categorize them as research variables or independent and dependent variables. What were the conceptual and operational definitions of the major study variables? Discuss whether the variable definitions were reflective of concepts from the theory/framework. Discuss whether the conceptual definitions were consistent with the operational definitions. List the demographic variables measured in the study. Briefly describe any extraneous variables identified by the authors. Research Design. Identify the specific study design. Explain whether the design was appropriate to use to answer the study’s research questions/ hypotheses. Explain whether the design provided a means to answer research questions/examine hypotheses. Briefly describe the study procedures (including recruitment, screening for eligibility, consent, timing

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount